Wednesday, May 31, 2006

The 5th Circle of Hell....is Actually A Bicycle Wheel

Pumping air into the damn tube. With help. Both photos courtesy of J. Huctwith, Esq.


Removing an inner tube from the tire. Or, trying not to rip the whole damn thing apart with my teeth.

They said it couldn't be done. HA! I showed 'em. I had never CHANGED a tire before on anything, hell, I don't think I've ever even pumped a tire full of air before, but I knew damn well if I was stuck on the road with a flat during this ride to Montreal, the responsibility for getting my ass back up on the road was MINE. So, to that end, Resident Guardian Angel of Sherbourne St., the veritable James Anok, volunteered an entire evening devoted to instruction and the practice of removing a tire and changing a flat. All sorts of little tricks to know (cover the new tubes in baby powder, it makes the changing of it easier, and its easier to see to make sure you don't get it wedged between the wheel and the rim) and I'm off tomorrow to pick up various tools that a cyclist cannot be without, including, yes, tubes and baby powder. Oh yeah, AND sunblock. I learned that lesson LAST week.

At any rate, James showed me how it was all done, and then let me do it by myself, with only a minimum of instruction. I managed to accomplish it, with only a minimum of cursing and invective. The effusive James Huctwith managed to document the entire enterprise, expletives deleted and all....

Tuesday, May 30, 2006

Its Happening Again.....


Its APPALLING. James had a curious coda at the end of his blog today saying, "Remember Moscow...." And I thought, "What the...?" So being somewhat perceptive, (but certainly not always) I figured it was a gay issue, as the architects say. (Well, actually what they say is "issue", not gay issue, as few things in architecture ARE technically a gay issue.....but I digress.) So there I was thinking, what has my beloved Russia landed in NOW? So I Googled it. There it was before my eyes, Moscow's mayor had forbidden this Saturday's Gay Pride Parade. Religious leaders of all three of the leading faiths, Christian, Jewish and Muslim had banded together protesting the parade. In a portion from Peter Tatchell's article for the Guardian, titled MARCHING IN MOSCOW, he notes that,

Much of the anti-gay sentiment that is sweeping Russia has been whipped up by religious leaders. Threatening violence against Moscow Gay Pride, the chief mufti of Russia's Central Spiritual Governance for Muslims, Talgat Tajuddin, said: "Muslim protests can be even worse than these notorious rallies abroad over the scandalous cartoons."

"The parade should not be allowed, and if they still come out into the streets, then they should be bashed. Sexual minorities have no rights, because they have crossed the line. Alternative sexuality is a crime against God," he said, calling on members of the Russian Orthodox Church to join Muslims in mounting a violent response to Moscow Gay Pride.

Russian Orthodox leaders responded by lobbying Mayor Luzhkov to ban the parade. A spokesperson declared that homosexuality is a "sin which destroys human beings and condemns them to a spiritual death".
Not to be left out, Russia's chief rabbi, Berl Lazar, said that if a Gay Pride parade was allowed to go ahead it would be "a blow for morality". He stopped short of calling for violence, but warned that the Jewish community would not stand by silently. "Sexual perversions", he said, did not have a right to exist. Lazar declared that Gay Pride marches were "a provocation" similar to the cartoon depictions of Mohammed.


Its an absolutely appalling state of affairs that in this day and age in a country that has a new constitution, ostensibly espousing ALL human rights, that government and religious leaders lose their minds, and let their phobias and prejudices take control of their sense of morality and duty. What is the point of democracy at all, if when the first time its mandate is truly tested, that it should be shoved aside to satisfy the overwhelming hatred of mob rule? Is not democracy THERE to be tested? Shouldn't examples like a gay pride parade be used to demonstrate the power of responsible government, not the fallibility of its so-called societal leaders? Any civilized culture, especially one that has survived the 20th century, knows that mob hysteria and homophobia is reprehensible enough and knows what calamities it can lead to. But that the same sort of prejudices and hatreds should be incited by government and religious leaders in this day and age is totally and completely inexcusable.

Yes, we all should certainly remember Moscow, and more importantly, the world should focus its eyes on Moscow's 1st Gay Pride Parade this weekend. If violence occurs, then the world's condemnation should be swift and fierce in its outrage that not only has homophobia struck again, but that the democratic voice has been willfully ignored. Otherwise, what can any of us hope for from democracy if it proves to be only a shadowy illusion?

Sunday, May 28, 2006

Portrait of a Girl in Glass


Titanium is more like it. Oh, she says she's fragile, but my friend Stephanie is as tough as they come. In a good way. God knows, she's been something like my right arm for nearly twenty years. She's seen me through weddings, births, deaths and God knows how many moves. She's even lived with me, poor child!

I had dinner with her last week, and realized that she's unique among my friends, in that she's stayed in my life the longest. Oh, I've known people longer, but they've not been as consistently there in my purview as she's been. Not anybody's fault you understand, its just the way life happens. I've been lucky with her. She has a clear eye, and in my moods and tempers she can see clearly what the root of a problem is. She smears me intellectually, which is rather irritating, as I'm used to being thought of as rather bright. But she's so self-effacing about it, that you sit there, too much in awe of her powerful mind to really be irritated at all. She's an actress, she's a playwright, she decided to take up technical writing, and now works (in her own office) as a proposal writer, she's even had her own business for heaven's sake! THIS is not a fragile girl! She's saved me countless times with dinners, loans, pep-talks, clothing - I'm serious! One shirt she bought me for my birthday got me laid more times than Mae West in BELLE OF THE NINETIES.

AND she cooks. Didn't I tell you? OHMYGAWD. For my birthday, in addition to HOSTING the party herself (on a night where she found out that night that she had to be at work EARLY the next day) she decided she was going to make me (from scratch) a 3 layer lemon cake. She's never baked before. She didn't even have baking stuff! Its a testimony to how good it was that I ate HALF the cake, and I don't even LIKE lemon cakes ordinarily. THIS ONE I LOVED. I would have ate more except that I passed out from too many martinis.

Oh I don't know, I could go on, but she'll probably kill me just for writing THIS much about her. I've known her since university, and I've watched her ups and downs, and I've seen her give one of the most amazing performances I've ever seen any actress anywhere, give. Like all of us, she's had her rough times in life, but she's persevered and triumphed and is one of the funniest women I know. She has a beautiful home of her own, two gorgeous cats and one of the most generous spirits I've ever seen. What else can I say? She's one of those people that you know will be there holding your hand at the end of the ride. For all that she's an everyday ordinary woman, Stephanie reminds me of so many extraordinary characters I've read and adored in so many of my favourite books, Claire, the omniscient best friend in Joe Keenan's hilarious novels, Aurora Greenway the hilarious and outrageous transplanted Boston widow from Terms of Endearment, and fragile Laura Wingfield, from the Glass Menageries. Its from that play that I first heard the phrase, Blue Roses, and I never forgot it. It was meant for Laura, but when I hear it, I think of Stephanie; a heroic rare flower in a field of common place Forget-me-nots.

Over the Hill and Through the Woods to Gramma's House We Go......


Photo Courtesy of Saxony Record Company

Actually not. Its more like fight your way onto the Spadina streetcar, get a two minute respite on an empty subway going to St.Clair West (try not to miss said stop) and then haul ass to get a seat on the St.Clair west streetcar and hope that nobody runs over you with a stroller or shopping cart. Then you hop out gleefully at Arlington, skip across the road (again not getting hit by any oncoming four wheeled types; the kind of the mechanized and gas guzzling variety) happy that you're free of mass transit for at least another eight hours and know that the rest of your evening is going to be spent in the madcap company of delightful beings who think (and tell you) that you're the niftiest thing since the Victrola played Fannie Brice singing "My Man".

(Hint, that's Fannie in the picture. Just in case you're wondering. I don't really need her in this blog, but I do like the picture.)

We're not going to visit Gramma. For one thing, both of my grandmothers have long since passed on, and besides, I doubt they even knew WHO Fannie Brice was, having grown up rurally, vaudeville being rare in King City, and I'm sure the Ziegfield Follies or Miss Brice never played there or Bracebridge. No, we're going to visit Nadia, who in many ways IS my Fannie Brice. For one thing, she has excellent taste. She's erudite, well read, shrewd, phenomenally knowledgeable about many things, is an excellent mother, and her friends to her are not friends, but FAMILY. Unlike Fannie however, she doesn't sing torch songs and again unlike Fannie, she has excellent taste in men; to wit, her husband John.

I've known Nadia since I was twenty-five years old and while I don't write blogs about my friends (you do one, you'll have to do them ALL) I was visiting Nadia last week and I realized that I had known her for close to fifteen years. It shocked the both of us. WERE WE THAT OLD?!?

I was working a horrid job in framing shop (underground in the CIBC Concourse) having to look at awful artwork of golf courses (paintings of golf courses, I shit you not!) and listening to goggle eyed bankers and lawyers drool over this tripe while my sociopathic boss went on and on about how it was a "limited edition" when all any fool had to do was look in the corner of the print and see that it was only 392/793. And in a faux mahogany frame no less....

But I digress.

I found out there was a job opening up at the Book Company up at Yorkdale Mall. I went up for an interview and was met by this incredibly warm, big brown eyed, tiny person, who was a BALL of energy. She sat down and asked me what book I was reading. I can't for the life of me remember, but it must have satisfied her, because we were chatting like old friends inside of two minutes. We've been friends ever since. (Needless to say, she gave me the job, and I quit the framing shop toute de suite!) Even when I moved to Ottawa for two years, we stayed in touch, and when I got back to Toronto it was like I never left. We try and get together, the four of us (this includes Nadia and John's brilliant five year old, Matthew) at least once a month for dinner and talk and a movie, and I must say, its a balm for my nerves. Mattie, (as we call him, for now, I imagine when he's a teenager that term will be off-limits) is this wide-eyed juggernaut of a kid. He's tall, has a mop of thick sandy hair, he's as sturdy as a rock, he READS, he writes, he's stunningly well mannered, and he calls me Uncle Trevy and greets me with a bone crushing hug whenever he sees me. He's five. (The same age, interestingly, as MY Matthew....)

The closest thing I can compare visiting the whole experience to, is going to visit your grandparents, IDEAL grandparents. You know, the kind that encourage you, and feed you, and tell you you're fabulous? Those kind? Like that. Except that they're younger than I am.

We sit, we talk about everything, life, death, movies, plays, what's childrearing and marriage like, what non-existent boyfriends are like, career ambitions, and we eat. My God, DO WE EAT. Or I eat. I pig out when I'm there. Especially at Passover. Nadia has a tradition that she has a Goyim Passover for all her non-Jewish friends, and we sit there, TRYING to read the prayer book backwards (in English), and wishing we could read Hebrew, because its such a snazzy sounding language. And its a lovely time, and people bring their kids, and the last two passovers, at the end, I drew funny pictures for Mattie and Nadia's friends Monz and Rick's little boys Nando and Ethan. Nando is a sports nut, he's ten, fearless and sensitive all at once, with killer eyes. Ethan is an elf. I'm convinced some sprite has taken the real Ethan's place and Monz and Rick have a changeling in their midst. He's quite magical. He also has a voice pitched high enough so that I'm certain only dogs can hear it. Both boys are great, except that they have a predisposition to eat sugar cubes whole. This I find vaguely disturbing. For some reason they think I'm kind of neat too. God knows why, I've never been any good with kids that I could ever see, even when I WAS one. But, if they like you, they like you, so you shut up and accept it and be grateful.

And I am grateful. Nadia and John have been unique in my circle of friends in that I've kept them almost exclusively, selfishly, to myself. I haven't shared them. The rest of my friends I dole out like Toffeefay because I want everybody to see how brilliant they are. (You don't believe me? I throw everyone I meet on poor Stephanie!! SEE MY FRIEND!??! She's a GENIUS!!! The girl will change her name to Crookshank if it doesn't stop...) With Nadia and John and Mattie, its selfish, but I keep them just for me. Maybe its because they're a family, and they're solid, and my faith in families have been shaken in recent years, and they give me faith that there ARE happy, contented people out there who struggle through each day, and WANT to be where they are, and don't feel TRAPPED in it. Maybe its because I feel safe there and I laugh a lot, and I forget my worries in a household of people who honestly enjoy each other's company. They expel loneliness, just by their very presence, which sounds redundant, but isn't. When I'm there, I'm a part of them. When you haven't felt like a part of something for a long time, its a lovely feeling, it gives you a broader vision of the world, of what life might be like. It alters your view and makes you feel as though you ARE connected after all. I don't know. All I know is that I love them and cherish them and I'll keep coming back for as long as they want me. There may come a time when I might have to share them with somebody, stranger things have happened. Until that time comes however, I intend to keep them, solely and exlusively for myself. Just for me.

Friday, May 26, 2006

Cycle Mania(c) Part Troix, or Gawd, but that Moon is BRIGHT....


So there I was out on my nouveau bicycle, pedalling away like mad, all the way up Leslie, thinking for the umpteenth time that my entire body was going to expire momentarily and they'd find my dessicated corpse lying on the side of a ditch in six months' time, looking not my best and completely vexed besides. But then I remembered that this bike cost me close to seven hundred clams, and I'd be damned if I was gonna die before I got that sucker to Montreal. To paraphrase Charlton Heston, they'd have to pry it loose from "my cold, dead hand."

I had an added impetus for riding harder this week; a dear friend of mine who has HIV had a fairly severe relapse on Monday, one that landed him in the hospital. If ever there was a timely kick-in the-butt-incentive for me to ride and train harder, that was it. He's out of the hospital now, and on the mend, but it was scary while it lasted. I suppose its self evident, but things like the PWA Ride for Life always take on more significance for you when its one of your own that's suffering. I hadn't fully realized that before, not really, as incredulous as it sounds. Now I had. Call it coincidence that the year I start up with this ride I begin to meet friends who have HIV, and I become more fully aware of the struggles they face in their health struggles with the disease. I'm not one to look a sign from the gods in the mouth, so this Saturday I kept on pedalling like mad, muttering under my breath (between gasps) up Leslie St., "I get it, I get it. But can't we have just ONE steep downhill rest before my lungs give up the ghost and my ass falls off?"

Sure enough, over the next rise in the hill....

The ride itself was somewhat nostalgic for me, as we went up into areas that I had grown up in and around; Aurora, King City and the environs surrounding. My childhood was spent in King, and it was interesting to see what the changes were. Hills I remember as steep and forbidding and dirt covered were now paved and graded back, no longer steep ski-ramps to try and pedal up. I passed my old grade school, (now a church) and two of my old houses, one just barely visible from the road, and the other right on Keele St. The one house was in terrible shape, but the overhang Dad built was still there, and the big cedar fence he built was there too....

I had the feeling as I rode down Keele, out of King, why we left in the first place. The damn roads were full of potholes!! I got jounced and jolted around so much, I'm sure my spine compressed and I lost three inches in height! Plus, I had forgotten that there is a constant but gentle decline from King City down to Toronto, consequently, the ride back was quite a bit easier than the ride UP. At the halfway point, I said "Screw it" to my track pants and rode the rest of the way in my bike shorts. Normally I don't wear skintight clothing, but my shirt was low hanging enough that I didn't have to worry about too much undue immodesty. Besides, everyone else was wearing them, so it didn't matter. There's a time for modesty and a time for sanity. And passing out from heatstroke while cycling uphill was just not on the sane side of the equation. Off went the pants!!

To that end, I completely forgot about the sun. Bad move. My legs were fine, (sheltered I suppose by my upper body leaning over them) and got just a little reddened, but my arms and tops of my hands got the worst of it. They still sting today, and hopefully by next Saturday, they'll be significantly healed enough to slather in sunblock and ride uncovered again....

As for the other part of this drive, Monday I start fundraising in earnest. I have done some, but I kept putting off hitting up the office until I was closer to the due date, as a lot of them would forget if I told them too soon. But the flyers and whatnot go up tomorrow in all the office kitchens (we have three floors) and I am ready with my schpiel. If I can cycle 74 kms in a little under four hours, I can bleed money from stone.

Speaking of which, here's the secure link if you'd like to sponsor me. Even a little helps so much.


https://secure.e2rm.com/registrant/personalPage.aspx?EventID=5250&LangPref=en-CA&RegistrationID=159931


Oh, and as for what happened over that aforementioned next rise? Yeah, you guessed it; my ass fell off.

Tuesday, May 16, 2006

Fame In a Box and the Culture of Entitlement; Where the Hell Did THEY Come From?

I

Echo and Narcissus 1903 - John William Waterhouse
Courtesy of Walker Art Gallery at Liverpool

I haven't had a rant for awhile, so here goes...

It was while walking down Queen St. and staring at yet another Tyra Banks poster in the streetcar stop, screaming about America's Next Top Model, that my brain finally snapped.

ENOUGH OF THE I WANNA BE AN INSTANTLY FAMOUS NON-TALENTED GIT ALREADY!!!

Its not as if American Idol (instant fame in a box, anyone?) or that throwback to eighties kitch, STARSEARCH wasn't bad enough, but what really gets me is the whole idea that hard work, perseverance and actually busting your ass for your art apparently isn't the point anymore. Maybe it never was. Maybe I'm just naive, and just got the point now. But somehow, I don't think so. My friend James, who is a real artist, doesn't do it for fame, (although if some came his way, I'm sure he wouldn't say no) he does it because he's an artist and he loves it. Some days I'm sure he hates it, but you can't work that hard at a creative endeavour the way he does and do it that well, and not love it. You can't. I don't believe its possible. So if art still exists, then how the hell has this mindless aberration of instant-fame become so prolific?

The point here again, is, FAME. No matter how you get it, everybody's desperate for it. "Gimme my ten minutes Andy promised me!"

Now nobody said success and fame are bad things. Ambition makes the world go round. Ask anybody. But this mindless sense of entitlement that goes on with these talentless would-be wanna-be G-list celebrities of the Jessica/Ashlee Simpson, Paris Hilton types, is just so incredibly obvious that it turns the stomach. They want adulation and plenty of it, and at any expense. Forget E, or Meth or any other drug. Fame is the one that has all the others beat. Bette Davis once sniffed at the expanse of actors she saw with little or no experience who got a "starring" notice placed on the credits. "In MY day," she growled, "You had to EARN that right."


Mother Goddam had a point.


Now we know that there have always been publicity-mad performers. Barnum and Bailey invented it. Jayne Mansfield was a genius at it. Joan Crawford LIVED for it. But you always knew there was always something a little endearingly pathetic and cracked about them. The Great Depression was FULL of nutbars for it, but that was spurred on by a national tragedy and breadlines. People were desperate to survive. But this current trend, (being so obviously fed by the rash of reality TV shows) is a little more avaricious and downright nasty. Its feeding on success for fame's sake alone, and its quite wantonly disturbing. Where is it coming from?

We have a generation or two of spoiled brats who got brought up on instant gratification, they were babysat by television, and had attention spans of the average housefly. They possessed grandiose senses of entitlement and had parents who just generally never said "no" to them at all. As a result of this, they grew up wanting and expecting everything NOW. This isn't just rich kids, or white kids, or black kids or poor kids I'm talking about. Its a persistent trend of impatience and selfishness I've seen in quite a lot of young people a bit younger than myself, (and I'm not exactly old) across all social lines who didn't have parents who laid down the law, and said "NO." Those kids grew up with a misplaced idea of their own entitlement, of selfishness, of "I deserve that, no matter if I did nothing to earn it. I deserve it because of WHO I am."

Which begs the question; "WHO exactly are you, or THINK you are, that you deserve special treatment?" Ask their parents. They'll tell you.

Oh, you've seen those parents out there, you know who they are. They're the parents who have been terrified of their children from the moment the little beasties first screamed. They will bend over backwards to ensure that their little darlings get EVERYTHING they want in life and will take on anybody who dares open their mouths to say, "Excuse me? But your child is a spoiled, sociopathic little brat." And then, they will wonder why their children have no respect for them as teenagers and thus grow up into socially inept, narcissistic assholes who end up blaming all of their failures and fuckups on their parents.

These are the parents who are thoughtless enough to bring six foot wide strollers onto streetcars and buses at rush-hour, and then expect everyone to get out of the way and give up seats for them. (A friend of mine brutally said to one young woman one day when she chastised him for not giving up his seat to her and her stroller, "Why should I? I wasn't the one stupid enough to get myself knocked up, now was I?") Those are the parents who have their babies sleeping in their beds with them until they're six, and think there's nothing wrong with it (co-dependency, separation anxiety, any of these ring a bell?) and then panic and wonder why they can't get little Tyler or Dakota to sleep on their own.

These kids then grow up with a psychic insecurity hole a mile wide, and suck their parents dry of money, resources and adulation for the first twenty years of their life, and then have the nerve to blame them for it. At the same time, the thought occurs to them that the next logical step is, "Hey I should be a star! That way I'll be like worshipped around the world, because, like, I'm fabulous and who WOULDN'T want to worship me?!? But I don't want to have to actually DO that much for it. Like go to school, or work or apprentice or anything lame like that, because that would like, take too long, and I'm 21 already, and like, that's like, SOOOO old in the fame game!"

Ergo; enter the Reality TV Show. Fame in a Box. The perfect tool to capture the unwitting attention of the classic narcissistic personality disorder. They will do anything for that dose of fame. Whether it be getting abused by a caustic, bitter, middle-aged Brit who never had the talent to play the big room himself, or variously, eat bugs, lie in a vat of snakes, live in a houseful of other sociopathic personalities for a month, bungee jump over craters of sheep dung, it doesn't matter, these sad sacks will do ANYTHING, as long as there is fame, a camera and a potential payoff at the end.

Now its America's Top Model. Now you don't even have to have talent or be daring anymore (or maybe you never did) you just have to stand there, look beautifully vacant, wear the clothes well, and we'll make you famous.

To digress momentarily, (like I've not done that before) I've never understood the whole supermodel thing. There are some admittedly whom I've heard of, who've got degrees in engineering (Cindy Crawford) and there is one (I can't remember her name) who has about five or six degrees and has written several books, and I believe has a PHD. She was quite blatant when she said it helped pay her way through school. Those people I have no problem with. Modelling was a means to get somewhere, or to pay for an education. A means to an end. But what about this mindless fixation just to BE one, and that's it? Who in their right mind fantasizes about becoming a mannequin?

Now I understand, that when you're starting out, you do what work you can get in order to get ahead. But all the time, you should be learning. Vivien Leigh, Audrey Hepburn and Lucille Ball all started out as fashion models, because they were starting out and they had to eat. But they became great artists, because they never stopped striving, or trying to better themselves. They worked at it and worked at it. It took them years, and in those three cases, they had to play down their beauty in order to be taken seriously at all, because the world was a lot more sexist then than it is now. The point is, they never rested on their laurels and said, "There. Now I'm a star. I don't have to work at it anymore." They did indeed become stars, but they were smart enough to keep working at their crafts. Which is why they lasted as long as they did.

Nowadays? I'd be mighty surprised if anybody from American Idol is known or even remembered in twenty years time.

This would be a good note to end on, for the fatuously self-involved who take up acting or anything creative as a road to instant fame; the minute you start pulling that entitled I'm-a-star shit, the fates will land on your ass hard. If you don't believe me, just remember that you too could be on Saturday Night Live one day, fucking up your lip synched CD, THAT YOU RECORDED YOURSELF, YOU MENTALLY DEFECTIVE SLUG FART!!!

See ya in the movies....

THOUGHT FOR THE DAY


Cumquat is a curiously apt name for a fruit.

Monday, May 15, 2006

Mother's Day, Or How My Nephews Danced At Fly

The dancing duo out in the great outdoors.

Now, my family lives far away, my Mom is in Ancaster, my Dad is in St. Catharines and my brother lives in Newmarket. Geographically speaking, you'd think we couldn't stand each other, but actually that's not true. We're all quite close, and even my parents, who are split, still talk on the phone a good deal. At any rate, I arranged Mother's Day down at one of my favourite restaurants, Fire on the East Side, which as some of you know, is connected onto FLY, the nightclub.

I picked the spot, as my Mom has been there before with me, and she likes it, the parking's right beside it, and its easy to find. My brother announces he's coming too. Delightful. He's bringing the wife and kids. Wife, no problem, but the KIDS? Umm. They're three, five, and seven. This isn't Chuckee Cheeze we're eating at here, folks. There are no chicken mcnuggets, pizza pockets or freezies. Plus they're all under the age of seven. How in hell are they going to sit still for two hours?! I try to delicately point this out to my brother, but he's obdurate. They're all coming. I roll my eyes, shrug and think, "Fine. If its going to be hell, its going to be hell."

Well, you could have blasted my garters off. It was a delight. No, I mean, really. I'm not funning either. My jaw hit the floor and stayed there for two hours.

The kids were adorable, well behaved, flirted with the staff and only tried to steal food off other people's plates once. (To be honest, in Christian's defence, that man didn't look like he was going to really eat that sausage anyway....) Matthew was the first one in, and generally, he's quite shy, but he saw my mother sitting across the restaurant and hollered, "Happy Mother's Day Gramma!!", ran over for a big hug, and then didn't leave her side the rest of the time. Melissa, my niece, who's also the oldest, sat there all in pink, and showed off a very pink, very sparkly handbag covered in sequins the size of dimes, and so she fit into the Princess motif of the place very easily. (Actually the necklace she wore that SAID princess would have made her the envy of every 19 year old snap queen on Church). Christian sat down, noticed everyone reading their menus, and very promptly picked up his and perused it quite seriously with no fuss at all . It seemed such a natural act, that it didn't dawn on me right away that, "Waitasec! Dude can't read!!" He didn't care. His father asked him what he wanted, and he pointed to the menu (which was almost as big as he was) and hit the frittata with fruit. He got fries with ketchup instead. It was all the same to him.

So we all had a good time, except for maybe Todd, who had to keep taking the boys downstairs to the bathroom, well, Christian especially, although I think he really just wanted to go down to check out the handdryers and watch everything flush. Keep in mind, when you're three, this is advanced technology.

At any rate, Todd (after taking Christian to the can for the fourth time) came back and asked, "Trev, do they get many kids in this restaurant?" And I said, "Well, not really, why?" He said, "Well everytime we walk by, everyone's smiling at us." I said, "Well Dorothy, you're not in Kansas anymore. They don't usually get Munchkins around here. In these here parts, children are a somewhat exotic commodity. Like carp."

The funniest point was when Todd was taking both the boys downstairs to the bathroom, and Matthew noticed the dancefloor and piped up, "Dad, what's that?" "That's a dancefloor. This is a place where grownups come and dance." Todd replied. Quick as light, both boys ran up the stairs and out onto the dancefloor and started bouncing around and dancing like maniacs. Head-banging dancing to be sure (their father was a metal head in his youth, and when their mother is out, plays Twisted Sister and the like, and all four of them, kids and Dad, practice air guitar and head banging.....quite the sight) but dancing nevertheless.

I wish somebody had taken a picture. Without a doubt, they're the youngest twinks ever to boogie at FLY.

Saturday, May 13, 2006

Back At It....

This typewriter is pretty much the way my computer will look by the time I'm finally done this @#$!!&@!!?! play. Its probably pretty much the way I'LL look too. Anyway, I'm back at it. In between loads of laundry, bike fixing and general housekeeping, I am going to try and fix this freaking nightmare for the 42nd time. Wish me luck. No don't. Just give me some chocolate covered almonds. Uggh. The creative life sucks. Oh well, its out into the wilderness I go again. See you in 40 days.

Photo courtesy of americanartists.org

Friday, May 12, 2006

Kindness of Strangers Indeed....


I was reading through a lot of these blogs, and have been impressed with the strength, courage and vision of these friends of mine. Its odd that we've taken to blogging at around the same time (I'm still a newbie at it) and I don't want to sound like an adolescent who raves on about his relatively new friends as if I'm six and "we're gonna be bestest friends until we're like, ninety-five!!" because, hell, who knows what the future holds or will bring? But for now, they're in my life and I am enjoying them hugely. Each of them in a way provides me with a different view, a different vantage point for looking at life, and its impossible (not to mention egotistical of me and vaguely insulting to them) to try and sum up what each of them encompasses, as they are all such complex and complicated creatures.

So I won't try.

I read their entries and I feel somewhat stilted and dry by comparison, but I am in such awe of their courage, and passion for living, that each thing I read of theirs is a singular and rivetting delight that inspires me on in my own journeys. In short, they are my friends and they inspire me.

My point however, (and yes, Ellen, I DO have one) is that their courage and outspokenness reminded me that I had never mentioned, much less acknowledged the debt I had to another hidden friend I've had all my life. The man who quietly, through his art and his experience, kept me from oblivion and despair and inspired me with his tragic genius more than any other stranger in my life ever has; Tennessee Williams.

What started me off on this realization was that lately, I've been reading his early letters in the hopes that, like a good tonic, it would get me off my ass and back to my writing again. More specifically, back to my play. You know, the one I am perpetually bitching about, THAT one. But its done more than that; its made me seriously think and consider for the first time in years, Tennessee Williams.

Born Thomas Lanier Williams in Columbus Mississippi on March 26th, in 1912 or 1914, (depending on which birthdate source you read) the first volume of his letters are from 1920 to 1945. The first letter included was written when he was about six to eight years old, writing his mother, after a long, surprisingly solitary train trip to visit his grandparents in Mississippi.

Apart from his sister Rose, its quite apparent that his grandparents were the great loves of his early life. His adoration for them shines through in every word. Its fascinating and funny and quite touching to hear this feisty youngster metamorphose into the eloquent and shy young man who would eventually become one of America's greatest playwrights. To hear him refer to his grandfather, the Reverend Walter E. Dakin as "Grandfody" and to hear his breathless description of roosters being killed and cooked by his Grand (mother) for supper (no punctuation naturally) and of bike rides taken and adventures had, quite clearly shows the physically strong, energetic and alert little boy he must have been. Simply put, his character radiates through his letters, and it's impossible not to like him. I'm not finished the book yet, and when I do, I'll probably put a more detailed analysis of it in here. There are two other volumes, the third (not yet published) which carries right on up to a few months before his death in 1983.

But I digress...

Williams has always been a hero of mine, albeit one I discovered by accident when I was a teenager. I was an old movie star buff (still am as anyone who knows me will tell you) and my current obsession when I was thirteen was the British actress, Vivien Leigh. I had seen her in Gone With the Wind, and fell madly in love with her, as most boys, (gay and straight) would, (she was added to Kate, Judy and Lynda Carter by that point) and I wanted to see and read everything I could about her. In the course of this new obsession, I naturally watched A Streetcar Named Desire, and started learning about its author, Tennessee Williams. Curious about this writer, I escaped to the library and read the original play of Streetcar and then I read his memoirs (scandalous reading to a hormonally amok 14 year old boy). My jaw hit the floor. I could scarcely believe that this elderly man had been rich, famous, lionized AND he was GAY!!! (Plus he was an Aries too!!!) In the deep dark well of my denial a small candle of possibility was lit. Was there hope for me after all?

Tennessee Williams was the first gay male icon I became aware of. For me, his example, his very being, at that point was literally like a light in the wilderness. He was the first public figure I was aware of who was gay, a mainstream legend, and open about it. It was like a bell went off in my head. I was becoming aware that my inclinations were leading towards other boys, and it tormented me. Living in King City, I was aware that THAT wasn't going to make me very popular, and popularity at that stage of the game was of singular importance to me. So the possibility that it might not be the end of the world if I was gay was something I seized on with the desperate appeal of the drowning. It was Williams who had unknowingly pointed out the way.

As I read more about him, and learned more about his tormented childhood, I could see that he too had gone through a lot of the same torments and doubts and fears that I was going through. I turned inward also, as he did, and sought an escape through the theatre, although at that point, where he wrote, I acted. I had always written and painted and acted, but it wasn't until high school, that acting really took off for me, and became an obsession; among other things, a way out of dealing with the reality of my homosexuality.

Tennessee became an obsession for me. He had escaped his childhood, and so would I. I would get through high school and eventually be able to deal with myself, but for the time being, until I could manage it, I would wait. He survived, (there was proof enough in his achievements so that anyone could see it) and for a young gay kid who knew nothing of gay culture at large, that was all I needed. If he could do it, I thought, so could I.

Williams and his art, so close to my own ideals, became beacons for me, signposts to help me steer past the shoals on my way through the twists and turns of adolescence. An average looking gay male had worked his way to mind-boggling success and acclaim. That he paid a very high price for it is common knowledge now; the pain of his childhood, the madness and loss of his beloved sister Rose's sanity, the death of his lover Frank Merlo, his own fear of insanity and hypochondria all helped fuel his own self-destructive nature. But. He had survived, and he had succeeded past anybody's wildest dreams. Nobody had thought he would amount to much, but he did, and he surpassed anything anyone could have dreamed of, and he took the future of American theatre with him while he did it.

It was this quality of being the underdog that I really identified with as a youngster. He was never earmarked for success. He wasn't a brilliant scholar and and he wasn't out of the ordinary way at all. But he succeeded. He believed in his daemon, his muse, and he worked hard at exploring and deciphering it. That he was a genius is undeniable. That he worked, and worked HARD for it, is less remarked upon. He proved himself, on HIS terms, on issues and dreams and hopes and fears that mattered to HIM, and that meant more to me than anything else.

How many times since hearing of his death when I was fifteen, have I wished that I could have told him, (had I known him then) what he and his work would mean to me in my life. In today's queer culture, with young queers out and proud and loud about it, I wonder if they know or even think about the price that trailblazers like Tennessee Williams paid for their ability to have Pride Parades, to get married, and to stand up in society and not be as stigmatized as they once were. There are and were so many of course to whom we owe a great debt, but Williams was one of the first mainstream public figures who was out at a time where it was seen as either an illness or a crime to be homosexual. This was before Stonewall, before AIDS, before all of it. He was out there, and tormented as he was by so many things, he never lied or tormented himself about his sexuality.

If Tennessee Williams were alive today, he'd be 94 (or 96) years old. What would he think of shows like Will and Grace, and films like Boys Don't Cry and plays like Angels in America and the explosion of queer culture on the mainstream? What would he have written about AIDS and the holocaust it's cost the world in so many ways? I can't imagine he would have been silent about it. What would he have said about how far homosexuals have come since the days when young Tom Williams was being jeered at and called "Miss Nancy" by his father, Cornelius Coffin Williams? In this day and age, what would he say about the neo-fascistic rise of the Republican party, and radical fundamentalism of the religious right? Growing up with an Episcopalian minister as a dearly loved grandfather, how delightful it would be to watch him cut down right wing religious zealots with his poetic gifts and religious history.

Oh, how we need his poetic eloquence and brutal honesty in these times of lying right wing propaganda and paranoid finger pointing. What might he have said about George W. Bush and the slippery slope he is leading his country down? Williams was always acutely aware of the state of his country, and he worried about it endlessly. I shudder to think of the horror he might have felt at the backwards social regressivism a large number of his countrymen have embraced in recent years. Paradoxically, I also glow thinking of the harsh indictment of it he might have given them for their blindness.

There is also a part of me that hopes that at the same time he would have been satisfied by the fact that people knew he had lived his truth and inspired others to do the same. Part of me hopes that he would be justly lionized by the queer press and queer culture for being brave enough to open the American cultural landscape to the inner pain of those who are different, who are sensitive to ways that aren't of the mainstream and the norm. One can only hope that he was aware of this in some way before he died, and was contented somewhat by it.

Tennessee Williams and his beautiful dreams and dreamers kept me going when I was a youngster and they have kept me aloft with their hopes ever since. Blanche Dubois may have depended on the kindness of strangers, but for myself, I have always depended on the dreams and courage of my old friend, a stranger, Tennessee Williams.

Soup Day....

Senior Staff Enjoying a Noonday Repast...


Soup day! My God, what an ordeal! Thank heavens Sonja was there, or I'd have lost my mind. Its something we do at the office, we have this big soup urn, and everyday somebody volunteers to make the soup. Since they're architects and snobs to boot (hee!) naturally, the soups are out of this world. None of this Mr.Noodle or Campbell's out of a can for this lot! So yesterday Sonja, (our IT wunderkind and soup genius) and I went out at lunch to go ingredients shopping. We came back with a bag of sweet potatoes, shadow benny (like cilantro, and I spelled it wrong, but I like it that way) garlic sprouts, fresh basil, butter, milk, cream and fresh dill. We threw it all in, and at quarter to twelve, I pureed it all. It was a little thin, but it was good soup and everyone liked it. It almost makes me wish I had a soup urn.....

Thursday, May 11, 2006

Speaking of Mad Musings....

My friends and I, (as anyone who's read Scotty's blog will know) sometimes go off on email threads of conversation about various topics of sundry and serious interests, as follows; it started with my mentioning what everybody did when they vented and blew off steam and when I asked B., (whom I haven't met) this was his reply, starting the whole thing off...


B: What do I do? It depends what's pissing me off. I rant. But I like to rant to the right people. If its access to drugs issues, I rant to a senior policy analysist (sp?) to the Ministry of Health, years ago when the government announced settlement to those who got HIV through blood products for "undue" hardship, I ranted on a CBC interview. Now, I rant on my blog, and to the media when required. I think my black sense of humour is a great way to let off pent up steam about things that piss me off.It's either that or find a good bottom to take it out on!

JA: I like the selection of appropriate venues for your venting!

T: Sigh. Only you would refer to a bottom as a venue.

R: What are you talking about only him? I'm a venue.

T: Darling Bert, you're NOT just a venue. NATO has you listed as a friendly port of call.

JA: Robbie, you're a full revue!

S: Bottom of the Senator?

JA: Guys and Balls?

T: The Ass Menagerie?

JA: Diddler on the Roof? Came-a-lot?

T: Came-a-lot? Ewwww!!!!!!!!

S: Poke-lahoma! There. I think that's the worst one yet.

T: Weenie Todd? Or if you're a dyslexic with Oedipal issues, Poke-a-hole-ma!

JHH: Arms Down Your Lay? Like the famous attraction at Niagara Falls: The Cave Of The Winds.

JA: Bottom and the Beast?

B: I thought the Beast was the bottom?

JHH: We ARE, motherfucking sonfabitching right on no fucking bones about it.

T: See what you started Brian?

B: You know it's been often said of me that I always bring the conversation to the lowest common denominator!

Admit it, don't you wish you had friends like mine?

Tuesday, May 09, 2006

Thought of the Day....

"Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness, that most frightens us. We ask ourselves, who am I to be brilliant, gorgeous, talented, and fabulous? Actually, who are you not to be? You are a child of God. Your playing small doesn't serve the world. There's nothing enlightened about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure around you. We are all meant to shine, as children do. We are born to make manifest the glory of God that is within us. It's not just in some of us, it's in everyone. And as we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own fear, our presence automatically liberates others."

Part of a speech Nelson Mandela made upon his inauguration in 1994

Blogomaniacs


I must admit, I've taken a shine to this blog thingie. I especially like Scotty's, because its quite vast with all sorts of doodads that mine lacks. He has a friends board, with comments about people and books he likes, and writers, etc. I'd like to put that on mine, but fear it may be a tad small in scope (the blog settings, not my ambition) to handle it all. It seems the best I can do is keep adding posts and hope people enjoy them. I don't think any of them are very good as yet. I haven't written anything like narrative in a long while, and it still feels rusty.

But I do like the fact that so many other people are doing it too. Its almost like a visual aid into the inner workings of your friends' minds. Of course, with mine, I sometimes feel that there should be a WARNING: DEMOLITION AHEAD detour sign waiting for the unwary. But no fatalities as yet, they all seem to have escaped unscathed. I think everybody should do this.....

Monday, May 08, 2006

Weddings!!!

No, I didn't get married. But my friends Ina and David did, or rather got remarried as they had a very small ceremony in the fall that not everyone could make it for, and so this was kind of like a party after the fact. Now usually, I'm not a weddings kinda kid, as I usually find them overblown, and all about the stuff. This was, (along with my friends Shaun and Jen's wedding in P.E.I.) simply the best wedding I've ever been to. It was about the couple, not about the loot. They'd been through a few struggles to get to that point (what couple doesn't?) including peeing cats, moves and house renovations, (and if THAT doesn't test your endurance, nothing will) but they made it through in one piece, and the whole ceremony was a great celebration of their pluck, humour and dare I say it, cynic that I am, their love. Not that sappy crap either, this was the real live whole "for better or for worse" enchalada. Even Paul (my old roomie) and I were teary-eyed, even though he said it was dust, and I claimed (and still do) that my tear-ducts were (and are) hermetically sealed. (I work in an architectural office, so I know about that things like that.) Nevertheless, none of us believed it. It was fab. And when Ina walked down the aisle looking like Garbo, Harlow and Dietrich combined, we lost it altogether. She was a vision.

Plus, there were lots of other fun stuff. The food was SUPOIB. AND, Tim W. was there, and so was his brother Jamie (whom I FINALLY got to meet) and I gotta say, yup, he's the cool sibling. He dances with dogs. HOW can you top that? Plus, I finally got to meet Timmikin's new beau (well, new for me, I gather Tim's gotten used to him, or vice versa...) Chris, and he's a peach! They came from Alberta, as did a lot of Ina's relatives, and David's sister did the best multimedia groom's speech I've ever heard and/or seen! If I ever get married, she can read my toast to the groom! Assuming I'm the groom. Or not. Whatever. I'll think about that tomorrow.

David was done up to the nines, and looked amazing, and was suavity itself. He and Ina were definitely the most glam couple in the room. I looked like a rucksack hauled over the side of a ship, Paul had a shirt with withered flowers on it, oh, it just doesn't bear repeating.....

Where was I?Oh yeah, Ina looked amazing!!! It was this kind of Jean Harlow kind of 30's evening gown in white satin, and matching elbow length gloves and vintage jewelry and she looked the berries!! See pickshaw.

All in all, it reconfirmed my faith in weddings, after all, its not something I see myself doing very soon, so its nice to go to one that if you AREN'T getting married, you can at least say, if I ever do land some poor worm and take the plunge into matrimonial perdition, I want the whole sendoff to be just like THAT. Except that I think Ina's dress looks better on her. To be on the safe side, I'd better just stick with the rucksack.

Saturday, May 06, 2006

Cycle Mania(c) Part Deux


Picture courtesy of William Castle & Hammer Films

Neck hurts. Should be lying down, stretching it out and I will in a minute. But then I have to shower and get ready for Ina and David's wedding. I'm hungry.

But I DID IT!! Fifty kilometers this morning. I thought I was gonna die. But then I always think I'm gonna die. That and I'll get lost. (Only one wrong turn this time, but other people made it too, and we went half a block before we realized we were off course...)

Of course, the high point (pardon the pun) was taking that left turn to go down this STEEEEEP hill and having my rear brake break off (ha ha) in my left hand. I thought, "Uh oh. Not good. Accelerating down a hill with no way to stop except a sudden intercession from gravity which probably won't be much fun if indeed it intercedes at all." So I tucked in, lowered my head, crouched down, and sped downward.

Fortunately no sudden Mac trucks loomed out of nowhere, nor did any potholes spring up, unannounced, and I got halfway up the opposite hill before it dawned on me that I had to start peddling again. Bummer. I was out by the Zoo and you'd be surprised how pretty and rural parts of Scarborough can be. Brooks and rivers and streams and fields and bridges and HILLS. My new bete noir of my existence. I'm getting better on them though. I don't know if its just because my legs are getting stronger (they're in perpetual pain half the time, so does that mean they're improving? Is getting in shape an indicator of constant discomfort? Or vice versa?) or because I'm numbing myself to the exhaustion? I keep biking to work, which I secretly thrill to when I first get out on the road as I like the speed. I feel like quite the sprightly monkey, all of six years old again, zipping around on my bike.

AND I'm a quarter of the way there in my fundraising! And I haven't even hit up the office yet! That's tomorrow. I'm making signs and posters to put up in the three kitchens so people can see what I'm up to.....hopefully it makes an impression and I rake in lots of cashola....

At any rate, I'm off to wash my hair. My bandana has flattened it out and when I brushed it out, I looked like Joan Crawford in Straight Jacket. See above. See? It ain't flattering.....




Friday, May 05, 2006

Speaking of High Stakes....

Picture by Perry B., courtesy of B.U.Drama Dept.




I'm going to get blasted for this I know, just for sheer cheekiness, and I acknowledge it. Its true. As Peter O'Toole said, "Only civilians talk about acting." Guilty as charged. I haven't acted in almost two decades. If I'm anything its a civilian. But, I DID do some time in the trenches and do remember a few things. So it was a pleasant treat for me, after so long away from it all, to revisit it as a spectator. I was out at a friend's acting class the other week, (he asked me to audit it) and I did, and it was interesting, because, as I said, I hadn't really been around young actors for around fifteen years, and I found they really hadn't changed much. They still bounced around like puppies, still vying for some invisible spotlight, and still trying to control whatever scene they were in of their own devising. It was adorable and amusing and touching, since I remember doing that so much (too much probably) myself when I was ahem, in my early twenties. But as I sat there, I realized something suddenly, (An insight! An insight! Yes, its true, I do have them, and not just when I'm hungover) and that is, actors, except for the time when they're onstage, really have no control over anything they may or may not do professionally. They can only decide to take the job, if they're offered it, yes or no.

Think about it.

Their casting is up to someone else, where and how they move is up to someone else, hell, even the words they utter is up to someone else. They are moving dolls who are expected to provide the sound and soul of a play or a film. We sometimes think of them and their doings as crazy, but is it any wonder? Who wouldn't go crazy when you are so absolutely at the command of others? No wonder they seize the moment to command a stage when they can and or their sets and stages if they make it to the level where they can exercise control. No wonder they become directors and producers, and often have a profound distrust of writers who come to interview them. If I spent my livelihood mouthing other peoples' words, I'd be wary around people who were going to manipulate my OWN, let me tell you! It makes sense, and its logical in a way.

As Garson Kanin once said, actors need to act, that's why they're actors. So it was fascinating to watch and see how they learned. I was watching one girl in this class, who was playing a school bully and she had remarkable eyes, shining and very alive. She played the scene and you knew, just knew, she was the bitch. It was implicit in her body language, in the inflections of her voice. She telegraphed it in no uncertain terms. I was watching her, and I thought, "O.K., she's the bitch, and she plays the bitch very well. But its nothing new. There's nothing she's going to surprise me with." I wondered, what if she had played the character nicely, sympathetically and gave nothing about what she was really thinking away? If she was, in fact, all deception? What if she deceived the character opposite, the audience, everybody? She could do it in the context of the scene. It wouldn't change the point of the scene at all, but it would give it more nuance. Villains never think they're villains anyway, and even if they do know it, they're never stupid enough to tell the other characters. Look at Richard III. He acknowledges his villainy to us in the beginning of the play, and then spends the rest of his time fooling the other characters until he becomes kind and then all hell breaks loose. We anticipate it, because its fun. But how much more fun is it when we never suspect? This actress I was watching could have made that choice, and it would have the scene so much more exciting to watch because we wouldn't have known what she was up to. But telegraphing your intentions right away simply takes the air out of the scene. You're sitting there, thinking, "So what? Now I get to watch you play a stock character for the next fifteen minutes." Hardly inspiring.

Now, of course, you could argue, the part is written that way. Of course it is. Its bad writing. Bad playwrights always tell you how to act. They don't have enough skill or faith in their craft (to say nothing of their faith in the average actor) to simply concentrate on the truth of what they're trying to say, to pare it down to its bare essentials so that the actor can do his job and make it live. They don't know how to do that with their writing, and so they put a lot of exposition in the stage directions to cover up their lack. Read good plays, and you'll find that rarely do good playwrights do that. Shakespeare never did, except when somebody got killed, and then you'd see something like, "dies". in the script. But other than that? Hardly ever. Chekhov never did. Tennessee Williams describes his characters ad nauseam when he introduces them, and then leaves them alone. Eugene O'Neill, same thing. Beckett, hardly at all. Mamet writes FOR actors and makes them work at it. The good playwright may indicate slightly, but they never make a habit of holding the actor's hand through the performance. Bad playwrights do that. Good playwrights concentrate on the dialogue, and leave the actors alone to do the rest. Incidentally, THAT'S how you find good actors.

That said, I was watching this young crop of mostly twenty-somethings, the girls all strikingly pretty, the boys all jockish and virile looking. Some were good, some were bad, but I noticed they were all mumbling and underplaying. Now I know acting for the camera is a totally different animal than acting on the stage. Onstage, its the body and voice, on film, its the eyes. In fact, I'd hazard a guess that film acting is trickier. It requires greater concentration in that its a) technically more complicated, and b) you have to harness all of the same energy into a laser like focus right into that camera, all the while ignoring that it's there. It's fascinating to watch. I was watching them, and even given the fact that they were all underplaying to the camera, they were also lowering the stakes of the scene too. To put it another away, they weren't investing their scenes with the emotional energy the scene deserved. They were afraid of being TOO big for the camera I would guess, and so they threw those moments away, instead of just concentrating and making bold choices and moments that make a scene come alive, they played it safe and treaded softly and as such, the scenes were, well, boring to watch and just basically died aborning.

I've often noticed that when you tell actors to play for higher stakes, (bad actors anyway) they simply think it means they should get LOUDER. It doesn't. Upping the stakes doesn't mean you alter what you're doing. You just give it more energy. Acting takes a LOT of energy. Even if you're playing a tired, dying old man, it takes energy to push that out, to get that across the proscenium to those people out there in the fiftieth row. (Its also I think, one of the reasons I gave up acting. I just didn't have that kind of energy. I do now, but I didn't then. Shows what age can do for you.)

But back to what I was saying, upping the stakes as an actor doesn't mean that you rend your hair, scream and sob while walking through a pair of French windows asking "Tennis, anyone?" or go about slashing your wrists while commenting on the profusion of Azaleas that year.

It simply means, (so far as I've been able to tell) that you commit to what you're saying, make the scene, make the lines MEAN more. Or basically, tell the truth. Mean what you're saying. If you're talking about a cornfield, visualize the corn in your head. If you don't know what a cornfield feels like, go find one and stand in it. Do what you have to do, but KNOW what you're talking about, otherwise how will you ever be able to invest your belief in it? And if you can't believe in what you're saying and doing, how can you really expect an audience to?

The nice thing to report is that they weren't, not one of them really, a lost cause. They have a great teacher who understands all of that, and more importantly understands each of them and why some do well, and why some don't do well. What remains to be seen is whether or not they will listen to what he says and learn from it. I've seen good teachers and I've seen bad teachers, and if you've got a good one, suck up everything you can get from them, because they're worth their weight in gold. Let's hope these ones do.

Tuesday, May 02, 2006

Nothing to Fear BUT Fear Itself, Eh?


Photo courtesy of James Huctwith

I'm a weirdass. I admit it. Oh, that's hardly news. Ask anyone who's known me for more than five minutes and they'll happily acknowledge it. I remember my old roommate Will saying once, "Trev's the only person I know who can and WOULD quote Katharine Hepburn on the subject of bouillabaise." The point is, I let things bother me that shouldn't bother me, and I let real-honest-to-God traumas roll off my back. I sweat the small stuff (as the books tell you NOT to do) and give the real Lear-like tragedies in my life a shrug and an "Oh well, THAT sucks large. I wonder what goes well with peanut butter and crackers?"

See what I mean? Weird.

Case in point; I'm finally relaxed now that I'm back at work. Huh? I took last week off to relax and unwind because I was stressed about my workload, and of course, THAT got only worse because all I did was think about it. I came back on Monday and it was all still there, and was as bad as I thought it was, but having seen it, I felt much calmer and quite cheerful about it. Last week, I was a basket case, an anxious mess, constantly imagining some Golgotha like scene awaiting me at my desk with angry emails and phone messages screaming for my termination at any second and now? Now I'm back and have cleared off a few skulls, (by no means all) and feel quite chipper. I'm not a workaholic by any stretch of the imagination, nor am I addicted to the idea of working, but the thought of failing at it occupies my thoughts constantly WHEN I'm not there. When I'm there, its all manageable. When I'm away it all seems large and gargantuan and hopeless.

Call me a weirdass, but I think I sense a pattern here. An old one.

Take this bike rally for example. Every neuron in my body screams, "YES! DO IT! Its the right thing for you to do!" and I know it is, it FEELS right. But I am so nervous before every ride, like its some great test that I'll fail. I've gotten through it so far, and stuck with it, and I'm getting pledges and I'm slowly succeeding, and the people have been awesome, and when I'm doing it, I feel fine and calm and at peace and not lacking in ability at all. When I'm not doing it, the enormity of what I'm attempting seems overwhelming and I think, "What am I doing? Am I insane? Who am I to think I can do this? Exercise to me is running to the bar without tripping, for last call!" And then I remember, "Wait. You've done difficult things before. You'll get through this. There is physically absolutely nothing wrong with you and no reason in the world why you cannot do this. Don't defeat yourself. You'll only fail if you let this fear grip you this badly again." An image of Churchill rings in my ear, quoting the above maxim in the title, and I think, "Yes Uncle Winston, I realize you had the Luftwaffe, Stalin, Lady Astor and the entire British electorate to give the finger to while I have only steep hills and cranky mini-van drivers to contend with, but let's face it, everything's relative."

But back to this fear however. It never leaves. I remember reading a line once that said, "the greatest gift any parent can give a child is freedom from fear." Oh, how that terrible truth has haunted me. My parents, encouraged us to get out there and live, but at the same time, they were afraid for us. And why not? My brother and I were into everything.

In my case, possibly too much. In addition to being physically reckless, (playing on train tracks, climbing anything climbable) I was loudly opinionated too. I didn't possess any tact and would ask the most embarrassing questions at the worst possible time. Children do this. But I'd made it practically a past-time. Where would it end? For my parents, it must have been too much.

I was terribly strong willed and resolute for someone so young, and I think that intensity frightened them. Something happened, and I think it was the three moves to three different cities (and thus three different schools) that we made in three months that did the damage. By age seven the damage was done, and the loud, opinionated, take charge, bossy snotnose had been reduced to a tearful, whispery, painfully shy introvert. Until that point, I was hell on wheels. I'd climb trees and get stuck in them until I finally found my way down, in amongst much screaming and hollering. I ran headlong into trees, walls, fell off bikes, down the stairs, up the stairs, but I survived. I got through everything, and in the back of my mind, I knew I always would. I got into scrapes, but I never got into anything that would physically endanger me. I was klutzy, and inattentive, but I never wandered aimlessly out into traffic, and if I wasn't paying attention to where I was, some instinct always pulled me back out of harm's way. A guardian angel? Who knows? The point was, I KNEW I would be safe. Despite my outside qualms that last to this day, I know, just KNOW, that deep down, I'll be FINE.

When I went to New York City a few years ago, I stayed out all one night wandering the downtown of Manhattan island, just walking, by myself, in awe of the place, and never in danger for a moment. I knew I was safe, I could feel it, because I fell in love with the demon that is New York (to quote Isak Dinesen) and I knew somehow that it would never allow me to come to any harm. I felt like that all the time as a small child, and the truth is, I STILL feel like that, only I forget to realize that and acknowledge that feeling of safety. I imagine that if I ever am truly in danger, I shall feel naked and the hairs on the back of my neck will stand on end, and I will know, "This is it. The gig is up. Your charm has expired." I don't doubt I'll know the truth of it the minute It starts stalking me. The fear I have isn't real, I know it, but on some weird psychological level I believe that it is. Its not logical, but its there. Like a fear of the dark or heights. I sometimes feel like the prisoner of invisible phantoms. Simone de Beauvoir once said, that "nothing, ever, wipes out childhood." and its true, nothing does. But that doesn't mean you can't rebuild.

I've never forgotten that, and in this time in my late thirties where I am trying to parent myself in a way, I am trying to rebuild and give myself freedom from fear, to rediscover that rambunctious pain-in-the-ass I remember from when I was very, very small, before he got SO unpredictable that he scared the hell out of his parents. I don't remember when I stopped being fearless and started doubting my own strength, it was sometime in my sixth year I think. Moving three times in three months might have done it, or perhaps I was aware of things in my world not being as stable as I would have liked, maybe I sensed adult fear, I don't know. Whatever it was, I came away from that year with the feeling (not articulated until years later) that I was somehow emotionally crippled. The spine hadn't snapped, but something had been lamed, the spirit I suppose. It would be lovely to rationalize it all, but what the hell, I was six. What did I know? Perhaps, that's why I'm doing this Bike Rally. In addition to doing something concrete and contributing to an important cause, I'm reclaiming a small bit of that hellion who dared to do what people said he couldn't do. I often think of Nelson Mandela's inaugural speech when he said, “Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness that most frighten us. ” If anything ever summed up my entire being, or struggle, for all of my life, it would be those two lines.

If I've done anything in the last twenty years, I suppose I've been trying to strengthen that quality, to take that lame spirit, and make it bold and strong again. Its quite the job, and I may never succeed fully, but I've got to keep trying. What alternative have I got? To give up, give in? Not bloody likely. All I know is, that when I cross that finish line in Montreal, I know I'll have accomplished two things; to strike a blow for a) a worthy cause that makes life a little easier for those who are suffering, and b) something much smaller and personal that only exists in my memory and my imagination; an old self, an idealized self undoubtedly, but mine nonetheless. It may be a weirdass concept, but I think that's something worth fighting for too.